Saturday Boobage 3-19-2016

This one is from Ray.

sb319a

Click on image to enlarge.

17 comments on “Saturday Boobage 3-19-2016

  1. Mismatched aureoles are a common factor in the female anatomy. Just like one foot might be a half size larger than the other. Our right side isn’t an exact mirror image of the left. Mother Nature has designed this through evolution. Just as some people are 6 feet tall and their siblings might only be 5 feet 4 inches. Anyway that justifies the irregularity and also tells us those bazungas haven’t been the subject of alteration by human hands. I’m a little tired from a long night of researching my new, yet to be published, book which will is based on my expert analysis of the mysterious “Third Nipple”. Yes it is a fairly common phenomenon, but little researched. The title of this learned tome is: “When three isn’t exactly a Ménage a Trois, but it’ll give you a stiffie in any event”. I expect it to reach #1 on the New York Times list of non-fiction best sellers.

    OK, enough advertisement. Denny charges me a lot per letter for these promotions.

    1) FACE: The typical porn queen. Albeit, an alluring queen. Does anyone really expect to see their pastors wife standing tall baring all for the photographer? No, it takes a certain type of individual. One who isn’t burdened with moral guilt and has a body to be proud of. Of course it doesn’t hurt to be paid a handsome fee to feed your Cocaine habit either. Actually this young lady possesses the attributes of a high priced Vegas call girl and those of an innocent, Celtic colleen right from the fields of Athenry after a hard day of tending the spuds. A closer look, however reveals the eye makeup that enhances her “harder” side. That along with perfect glistening white dentures says sophisticated lady, not a rural begorrah babe. I’m excluding her auburn mane from my analysis. Rating: “A++”.

    2) BOOBAGE: I immediately fell in love & lust with these natural beauties on seeing them. A perfect size and despite the irregular and slightly large aureoles these well rounded firm mounds do the young lady proud. There really isn’t any more to add, except they would qualify for my top 10 finest boobs. Too bad she doesn’t have that strategically placed third nipple. That’d be the highlight of today’s anatomical analysis. Rating: “A+++”.

    3) TORSO & UPPER THIGH: I’m combining these two areas because Denny has obviously cropped the photograph to sate his moral abhorrence of revealing the mons veneris. Fur bearing or bald it’s a delight to gaze upon in most women. Hillary Clinton is an exception unless you’re a young hot female bent upon climbing the Democrat ladder and averse to giving Slick Willie a blow job.
    Any way this lady’s mid-section and thigh areas rate high on the scale. Smooth, firm and totally devoid of any blemishes. Rating: “A++”.

    Toejam overall rating: “A++”.

    Right up there with the best, alright. Thanks Ray for your contribution to Saturday’s debauchery at Denny’s den. Today’s a play catch up on housework and tax preps. So I forgo my Fem de la Femme forage visit to the mall. As the temperatures are dropping and the chance of rain rises I doubt there’d be any eye candy worthy of viewing anyway. To paraphrase Scarlett O’Hara’s final line in the epic masterpiece: Gone with the wind (The same condition my jockey shorts are after a healthy, moist fart)……Tomorrow is another Day. I can see the Spanish moss hanging from the Cypress trees as the scene fades to black.

  2. Ron in Ohio Sez:

    I was only gonna’ add that those headlights certainly are on bright and need a bit of realignment. The left one will blind ya’ coming down the road. Perhaps a lot of gentle massaging and some salivary lubrication will help the right one. However, the quickest solution for her would be to begin dating more left handed men.

    The mismatched areolae never did bother me though, I found that if ya’ just close your eye on the side of the smaller one and squint in the other eye, it’ll bring them into focus.

    Then, I read the previous comments. I gotta’ agree with rickn8or and toejam on this one. And, not that it matters but, I agree with toejam’s assessment.

    The strangest thing that I ever saw in my younger days was a gal with mismatched boobs. One was over a cup size larger that the other. But, I was a very sympathetic and obliging young man and only worked on the smaller one all evening.

    PS:

    Guys, Webster says; Areola – plural – are·o·lae or are·o·las (Not that it matters anyway, as long as you have an image to convey the thought)

      • Ron in Ohio sez:

        Once again I gotta’ agree with ya’ toejam. Those mammary monsters are definitely au naturel. Upon closer (zoomed) inspection, I can see where both areolae would most certainly please a blind man with their obvious braille message.

        As for the face, I must again agree. She looks like the kind of gal that my dad would have said; “She looks like she’s been around the block a few times and will show ya’ the route if ya’ wanna’ go along.”

        The only distraction for me is that shiny belly button thing-a-ma-jig. I’m a firm believer that a beautiful woman needs no foreign accoutrements (No piercings and definitely no tattoos) to mar her natural endowments. For me, the epitome of natural beauty would be a lass with all of her natural beauty, standing before you, nude of all unnatural frills, no make-up, hair down and a lovely “come hither” smile on her face.

        • “I’m a firm believer that a beautiful woman needs no foreign accoutrements (No piercings and definitely no tattoos) to mar her natural endowments.” – Ron in Ohio

          B, b, but how will they look different like everyone else if they don’t desecrate themselves?

  3. Hey Denny … everyone’s offering up clinical dissertation’s on this young lady’s anatomical delight’s.

    How about this one: a real nice looking gal to grace this morning’s Saturday Boobage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *