Thank you previous commenter folks for the kudos on my selection for the boobage of the week. Yes this young lady has magnificent boobage, albeit probably partially silicon based. Dr. Finkelstein does fine work. It’s almost as if he were a well known sculpture, but instead of working with marble he works his magic with the living human body. By the way he’s been contracted by the U.S. Army to begin a project in which he will be the project director in creating a 38D cup, well rounded Chelsea Manning who may, in the future, appear on Saturday boobage. It’s gonna be a long project so don’t get all worked up now. The army is beginning by letting Chelsea grow her hair and ingesting Leavenworth weiners both orally and anally. Dr. Finkelstein has yet to perform the castration and vaginal replacement pat of this worthy project.
OK, on to an abbreviated analysis of our little (well not that little) beauty:
1) Face: Don’t let that flowing faux blonde hair fool you. She’s actually a brown haired babe, but like most women she realized blonde tresses really turn us guys on and her hair-dresser did a fine job. Her cute face is perfectly highlighted by those long locks and when she’s in the mood (which is often) she has a wonderful and sensual way of using that hair to excite her partner. I won’t get into it now, but believe me it will make your prostrate spasm so strongly for an hour after she removes that hair from your most sensitive area that the sounds eminating from your asshole will rattle the windows in your bedroom. Rating: “A+”.
2) Boobage: The real appeal that these sacs of breast adornment isn’t really the size. Even I have to admit Dr. Finkelstein went a bit too fat in creating these monuments to womanhood. It’s their perfect shape and the proportion of the aureoles and nipple to her fun bags. Yes they are a work of art that any man would be happy to place his face between. Rating: “A+”.
3) Torso. Wow, for a woman with such humongous breasts her tight waist stands out as a testimony to her excellent physical appearance. Perfection in both tone and girth, which flares from her waist out to those luscious hips. Rating: “A+”
3) Thighs: Two of my favorite body parts. A woman’s thighs tell a lot about a woman’s personality, if you examine them closely. This young lady displays two of the warmest, most sensual, shapely thighs I’ve laid eyes upon in a while. If you look closely you can see the convection waves of her hot loins that are created as her body core heat is radiated out. That body heat conveys sensual phernomes which gentle and subtlety waft through the air, are picked up by the male’s olfactory cells and thus producing a tremendous rush of Testosterone. The result can be observed in any college dormitory room on a Saturday night. Rating: “A+”.
Although my chart goes up to “triple + rating” I feel this woman has only the attributes fto attain a single +. I can’t get into her short falls, which lower the rating but they are indeed minor and I’m sure she’s worthy of a higher score in many other male and some female eyes too. Right Ellen DeGeneres?
So Toejam’s overall rating is the predictable: “A+” for this well endowed bodacious lady.
DDP, I hope you drop into today’s session and take a gander at a woman who almost, but not quite, displays your most delectable body.
Ok, first, this is a fantastic specimen for Saturday boobage. She is a total package. Second, if I’m reading TJ’s critique correctly, are you saying these are surgically enhanced? I would have to disagree wholeheartedly if your answer is yes. If she did pay for these, she needs her money back. WAY too asymmetrical for them to be bought and paid for. I believe these are two very lovely, natural packages that were put here on this earth for us to enjoy.
Hey, rayvet, could you point out the asymetrical points of interest? I can’t spot any. Do we need a boob caliper to prove one is 1/2mm smaller in diameter at the base? Aureoles and nipples look like they’re clones. Let me know.
I agree with Finkelbrot. The right is quite a bit larger in diameter than the left and hangs a bit lower. Part of my job is to be observant of things, and that’s one of the first things I look for in a boob to tell if they are man made or not.
Ah Hell!! The only wrong with her is ain’t in my bedroom. Ya done good Toejam
That is one hot little honey. T. J. can send her my way, she doesn’t have “boy-nips”.
Okay, since this comes from Toejam I just have to ask, are these optimally-sized aureoles? I need to get calibrated here.
Okay, T.J., where you got this perfect little honey stashed?
Thank you previous commenter folks for the kudos on my selection for the boobage of the week. Yes this young lady has magnificent boobage, albeit probably partially silicon based. Dr. Finkelstein does fine work. It’s almost as if he were a well known sculpture, but instead of working with marble he works his magic with the living human body. By the way he’s been contracted by the U.S. Army to begin a project in which he will be the project director in creating a 38D cup, well rounded Chelsea Manning who may, in the future, appear on Saturday boobage. It’s gonna be a long project so don’t get all worked up now. The army is beginning by letting Chelsea grow her hair and ingesting Leavenworth weiners both orally and anally. Dr. Finkelstein has yet to perform the castration and vaginal replacement pat of this worthy project.
OK, on to an abbreviated analysis of our little (well not that little) beauty:
1) Face: Don’t let that flowing faux blonde hair fool you. She’s actually a brown haired babe, but like most women she realized blonde tresses really turn us guys on and her hair-dresser did a fine job. Her cute face is perfectly highlighted by those long locks and when she’s in the mood (which is often) she has a wonderful and sensual way of using that hair to excite her partner. I won’t get into it now, but believe me it will make your prostrate spasm so strongly for an hour after she removes that hair from your most sensitive area that the sounds eminating from your asshole will rattle the windows in your bedroom. Rating: “A+”.
2) Boobage: The real appeal that these sacs of breast adornment isn’t really the size. Even I have to admit Dr. Finkelstein went a bit too fat in creating these monuments to womanhood. It’s their perfect shape and the proportion of the aureoles and nipple to her fun bags. Yes they are a work of art that any man would be happy to place his face between. Rating: “A+”.
3) Torso. Wow, for a woman with such humongous breasts her tight waist stands out as a testimony to her excellent physical appearance. Perfection in both tone and girth, which flares from her waist out to those luscious hips. Rating: “A+”
3) Thighs: Two of my favorite body parts. A woman’s thighs tell a lot about a woman’s personality, if you examine them closely. This young lady displays two of the warmest, most sensual, shapely thighs I’ve laid eyes upon in a while. If you look closely you can see the convection waves of her hot loins that are created as her body core heat is radiated out. That body heat conveys sensual phernomes which gentle and subtlety waft through the air, are picked up by the male’s olfactory cells and thus producing a tremendous rush of Testosterone. The result can be observed in any college dormitory room on a Saturday night. Rating: “A+”.
Although my chart goes up to “triple + rating” I feel this woman has only the attributes fto attain a single +. I can’t get into her short falls, which lower the rating but they are indeed minor and I’m sure she’s worthy of a higher score in many other male and some female eyes too. Right Ellen DeGeneres?
So Toejam’s overall rating is the predictable: “A+” for this well endowed bodacious lady.
DDP, I hope you drop into today’s session and take a gander at a woman who almost, but not quite, displays your most delectable body.
Awww Toejam….
~XxxOoo
Ok, first, this is a fantastic specimen for Saturday boobage. She is a total package. Second, if I’m reading TJ’s critique correctly, are you saying these are surgically enhanced? I would have to disagree wholeheartedly if your answer is yes. If she did pay for these, she needs her money back. WAY too asymmetrical for them to be bought and paid for. I believe these are two very lovely, natural packages that were put here on this earth for us to enjoy.
Hey, rayvet, could you point out the asymetrical points of interest? I can’t spot any. Do we need a boob caliper to prove one is 1/2mm smaller in diameter at the base? Aureoles and nipples look like they’re clones. Let me know.
I agree with Finkelbrot. The right is quite a bit larger in diameter than the left and hangs a bit lower. Part of my job is to be observant of things, and that’s one of the first things I look for in a boob to tell if they are man made or not.
Consensus seems to be she’s fine. Who’m I to argue? Great contribution, Toejam. Thanks for posting her picture, Mr. Wilson, sir.
indeed, Dr. Finkelstein is loosing his sight. Same with TJ .. her right one is bigger than her left one. C++
Nah I think it’s just the angle of the dangle. I have to agree with TJ that’s she’s about as perfect as they get.