Ron wrote a little missive about Cankles.
Just read some articles about HC’s refusal to answer questions from reporters. Wanna know how her surrogates are responding to criticism that she hasn’t answered a legitimate meaningful question not planted by some acolyte at one of her “town meetings” for a month now?
She’s “PUTTING THE VOTERS FIRST, HILLARY ANSWERS THE QUESTIONS THAT REALLY MATTER” and the all-caps is the original, not my idea.
Questions about Benghazi or e-mails or private servers or missing funds or immigration or ISIS apparently don’t matter to people who intend to vote for her, n’est ce-pas?
Now, you can’t really blame her for keeping her mouth shut except for rehearsed responses to planted questions. She gives speeches that make the audience slip off into the arms of Morpheus, and when she actually DOES address an issue, it’s nothing but ultra-safe, highly-crafted, recycled sophistry and equivocation, not even full of sound and fury but still signifying nothing.
She may be inevitable, but she’s just not likeable. Answering questions from real journalists is the last thing she wants to do, mostly because she’s no good at it, unlike her philandering partner, with whom she’s made over 25 million in speeches and appearances while claiming to be “dead broke.”
Boy, it just never lets up . . . the deceit, the spin, the stonewalling, the hypocrisy, the deflection. Hillary Clinton lies not only effortlessly, but artfully, as if it gives her great satisfaction to weave false narratives out of the carnage and destruction that bobs around in her wake until it finally sinks slowly to the sludge at the bottom of the political swamp, out of sight, out of mind, out of the headlines.
And what is amazing is that she lies about the most trivial things, like being named after Sir Edmund Hillary. The PIAP was born in 1947. Sir Edmund Hillary didn’t climb Everest until 1953. No one had ever heard of him in 1947. Or here’s another doozy. She said she tried to enlist in the Marine Corps but her eyes were too bad. Besides being a sociopath she is, in the words of William Safire, “a pathological liar”. She and my ex-wife have a lot in common as my ex also lied about the most trivial things. – GOC
I can think of nothing, not one single thing, that she has accomplished in the past 40 years of which she can be proud, not even her daughter, and I really don’t believe that those who intend to vote for her can do so either. In fact, she’s what we might call an “errorist,” one incapable of correctly assessing situations and making proper decisions, rather like her last boss.
Does she still have a valid law license? I’m not sure. In fact, I’m not entirely sure she ever actually had one; did she? Wasn’t there something about her being fired as a lawyer who lied and abandoned both ethics and the Constitution? Maybe not a JD, but I know she obviously has a PhD in Obfuscation and an LlD in Poppycock to go with her MS in Rigamarole and BA in Twaddle.
As a young lawyer, she got kicked off the team investigating Watergate due to her total lack of ethics and disregard for the Constitution. She got an early start. – GOC
To paraphrase Marc Antony, and just about anyone right of center, Hillary is ambitchous. She looks to me like someone so intent and focused on acquiring the type of supreme power traditionally held by men that the strain has caused her to herniate a disc.
So now she’s on percodan and oxycontin for the pain and librium and valium for the penis envy. Her cerebrum has morphed into a mass of congealed false figments, and her speech centers have lapsed into echo-chant encores based on stale clichés and hackneyed shibboleths.
Her campaign bus finally ran out of fuel and broke down, so now she’s stranded at the intersection of Deception Boulevard and Disavow Avenue. Her speeches are highlighted by recycled rubbish and seasoned with DNC Convention floor sweepings, and her campaign logo looks like something dreamt up by a 3rd grader on Ritalin.
Her entire adult life as far back as Wellesley has been highlighted by a series of scandals and embarrassments. But times have changed. Scandals are cankers on the hide that you can no longer hide, mostly because of smartphones and YouTube. If not properly treated, they can fester and become necrotic. Then if something bumps into them, they ooze a contagious slime which contaminates everyone.
Scandals don’t really matter to Dimocrat voters or the LSM propaganda arm of the Dimocrat Party unelss they involve Republicans. There was more coverage of Bridgegate that there was of Benghazi. – GOC
That’s what can very possibly happen under a Hillary PotUSy. Her team is as organized as the Mafia, but not as personable. She’s like Michael Corleone: her nature is to be vicious, brutal, obscene, and greedy; she’s incapable of operating any other way. It’s in her DNA. Only, and I stress ONLY, if available solutions to hot-button issues add dollars to her coffers and layers to her defenses will her decisions benefit the nation.
Hillary is famous for nothing and infamous for nearly everything. Still, she somehow remains confident and secure in the murky depths of her ignoble perfidy, shielded from the slings and arrows of reality by a doting press which tosses cupcake questions to her and heaves hand grenades at her opponents.
IOW, I have had a vision of the future, and it’s broken. Nixon took us from a Norman Rockwell America to a Captain Queeg America. Jimmy Carter took us from a beleaguered America to a Mister Rodgers America. Slick took us from a Reaganesque victor America to an Animal House America. Soetoro took us from a recovering America to a Mike Tyson America. And Hillary will take us from a tomato-can America to a Detroitus America.
Hillary Rodham Clinton is a monotonous, potty-mouthed maladroit with delusions of adequacy who, unless somebody does something, two years from now will hold the crumbling reins of what once was a strong and prosperous nation. Her single credential for the PotUSy is a seldom-used and long-forgotten vagina in an era of noisy female ascendancy.
The woman, and I say that only because of the fact that she did give birth once (her daughter’s face is all the evidence I need to accept that reality), has all the management acumen of a turnip and the tact of a pit viper. I don’t doubt her ability to make decisions, but generally they’d be the kind that would destroy your credit, confound your associates, and cause your house to collapse.
Whil;e she and Slick manage to make a lot of money while destroying the country. – GOC
To her the truth is like holy water to a vampire. An inventory of her false or embellished or misleading statements would take several pages. She is a socialist by association, but a mafiosa by nature. When that 3 a.m. phone call comes in, she’ll be ready to deal with it . . . so long as personal profit for her is involved.