Jay Zeus! Wholly Fargin Shi’ite. Will this merde NEVER end!!
O.K. So a few heads are exploding at Klintoon CHQ. Spittle is flying, and the English language is being enriched by formulation of flaming neologisms. Slick is probably looking for Loretta Lynch’s private cell fone # on his smartfone, and Podesta is trying to remember Comey’s favorite brand of scotch.
Huma is more than likely looking for some succinylcholine to slip into her estranged husband’s matzoh soup, and HRC’s private physician is digging in his bag of tricks for the Diazepam epipen.
O.K. So Comey got some angry feedback from a lotta FBI agents and lawyers and wants to cover his ass this time. Last thing he wants is for the issue to result in an indictment for her AFTER she’s elected and the press to erupt in a feeding frenzy accusing him of withholding it from voters to avoid negatively influencing the election.
I will not be a’tall surprised for DingleBarry to jump in on this and quash whatever this latest whackamole “scandal” is. One way or another, he’ll protect his legacy from a Trump card, either by leaning on Lynch and Comey or just waiting to see if she wins and then pardoning her if she does. Once she’s sworn in, she’s immune, and Murkans’ memories tend to be very weak and leaky – I mean after all, they elected Slick –TWICE – and then Soetoro – TWICE!! It’s as if we have a political death wish.
My take on it all is that it shows (1) the ineffectiveness of the first “investigation” or (2) just how corrupt this administration really is. At the very LEAST it strongly suggests that Huma lied to the FBI on the first go-around.
Just seems to me that the system didn’t work very well on the first investigation(s). Apparently there was plenty of “There” there, but they diddled around for over a year and came up with about the lamest excuse imaginable for not indicting her.
And even if these new e-mails aren’t Hillary’s direct fault, they’re due to her bad judgment in how she handled sensitive material from day 1. It also brings her attitude into play, in light of her hypocrisy of lecturing her subordinates about the dangers of private servers and then setting one up for herself.
A lot can be learned about a person by the people he surrounds himself with, the friends, the advisors, the employees. In hindsight, we can see that Slick’s prime motivator was his libido; DingleBarry’s was his hubris, and Cankles’ is her treachery.
BUT – and this is the bottom line . . . people just don’t care any more. You ask the average woman or liberal or millennial whose mind was made up a long time ago to vote for her and this won’t make the slightest difference. For most young people, it’s all just too confusing and actually requires thought.
Put another way, I don’t see this as the big “October Surprise” that will alter the election. Hell, millions of people, both dead and alive, have already voted for her, and we can’t change that no matter what. NO WAY this “investigation” could ever be completed in the next week and a half, and even if it is, she’ll still be considered innocent by her rabid supporters until proven guilty, and then most of them would still vote for her out of gender loyalty or for the protection of their entitlements, which they know would be endangered by a Trump with a conservative Congress.
No . . . fone lines are burning between CCHQ and several key figures in the administration. Lots of good ol’ Anglo-Saxon gerunds and participles and imperative verbs are floating around, but by this time next week we’ll be talking about something else, I’m sure.
If anybody had been able to see the future 18 months ago and written this out as a novelette, nobody would believe it. Actually, it’d be funny if it weren’t so tragic.
Did we really elect those two losers – or did they steal the elections?
Merle
Sadly, I think we (collectively) did actually elect WJC… at least once, and probably twice. Bush did plenty enough to cost himself the election the first time around. And did Dole even say anything useful or memorable in his whole campaign? And Perot didn’t help, of course.
But I really doubt we were actually stupid enough to *legitimately* elect BHO. Maybe once. I have some doubts about round one, but they are mild and unproven. The fraud was a little too blatant the second time around tho.
You know, if it hadn’t been for Opra, BHO would probably still be in Illinois. Pretty ironic, he never invited her to the White House.
Well written Denny, Bravo.
I didn’t write it. Ron did.
My mistake. WTG Ron.
Easy mistake to make. Denny’s “voice” and mine are quite similar in many ways, and our views generally dovetail quite nicely.
Ron’s writing is better than mine.
I enjoy both of your dissertations and points of view. Does that make me a 59 year old white male redneck that owns, arrrghh, guns and loves to hunt and that likes girls from KCMO?? AM I one of those?? You betcha I am. GO MR. TRUMP!!
“by this time next week we’ll be talking about something else, I’m sure. ”
Surely, Ron, you don’t mean that they’ll be tryin’ to throw Colon Kaperdick in our faces, or the need for Special Snowflake Safe Spaces, do you? The Media couldn’t actually be in on this, could they? /sarc/
I work with a rabid hrc supporter and for her it boils down to 2 issues: her uterus and her paycheck (apparently, only democrats hire librarians??). When questioned about the scandals, the lies, the corruption, the answer is an emphatic I DON’T CARE. We’re doomed!
While the ‘why’ behind Comey’s sudden ‘come to Jesus’ moment that is prompting a renewed look at old well documented crimes is open to discussion that is about all that is new.
Nothing will come of this just as nothing happened from the first ‘investigation’. Why? Because the FBI is IMPOTENT at this level.
They investigate and they arrest. After that EVERYTHING that occurs
is the purview of the Just Us department. And we have already seen how
well Slick Willie put ‘the fix’ in for Cankles on that airport in Phoenix.
Lynch runs the Just Us dept. but her leash is held by Obama….and HIS strings
are pulled by the DNC, George Soros etc. So as long as the dems control the White House they control what is done with any info that is ‘investigated’. And
unless they decide to offer up a scapegoat for sacrifice ( paging Huma Abedin)
NOTHING will happen to ANYBODY of importance.
Regardless of the outcome of the election ( and with Smartronic etc. firmly in league with Soros and the DNC Trump has virtually no chance at winning)
Obama will be issuing a full and complete pardon to the Clintons and other important lefties like Podesta. Once that happens it DOES NOT MATTER what the FBI finds, what WikiLeaks leaks and it CERTAINLY doesn’t matter what the sheeple think about the subject.
Lightning is more likely to strike causing monkeys to fly out my ass than to have Trump win. Clinton will be POTUS and once inaugurated she will be untouchable. Expect a purge in Mordor on the Potomac that would make
Stalin and Mao blush. Comey is a DEAD MAN WALKING, so is Dickman Weiner and probably a few more. Incidents of ‘arkancide’ are going to skyrocket after January.
I fear you are correct on all of your points.
There are limits on what a president can pardon. Unfortunately, most of what she’s done seems to fall within the limits. If he does, though it’ll look very suspicious. I also wonder if a president could pardon herself…
The ONLY limits on what a president can do arise in congress. If he exceeds his authority they can act to
overturn whatever he does. Impeachment is the main
recourse they have but there are other mechanisms in place such as withholding of funding etc. The problem
is of course that congress is USELESS. In the real world
the POTUS is beyond any meaningful control.